Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(392)
-
▼
April
(37)
- Justice Scalia’s most recent entry in the kulturkampf
- New article on filters and fair use
- Wink, wink, nudge, nudge
- New book on privacy
- IP/Gender: panel two
- IP/Gender: Panel Three
- IP/Gender: Panel One
- IP/Gender: keynote
- She blinded me with science
- Dilbert explains why rebates are misleading
- Turnitin still on top
- Slate isn't Fox
- When casebooks become cases
- Advertising Law CLE
- My colleague David Vladeck to the FTC
- Public performance
- Statin advertising and FDA preemption
- Lather, rinse, repeat: horse shampoo TM case conti...
- False accusations of patent infringement justify f...
- Too much attribution?
- 5 Hour Power struck unfair blow against alleged in...
- tax protest as false advertising
- MSNBC.com on the Fairey v. AP case
- FDA warns companies over sponsored links
- Things you never want your musician-client to say
- Plastic fantastic: failure to monitor packaging do...
- FTC ad parodies freecreditreport.com
- IPSC deadline extended
- Discussion questions
- Settlement disagreement leads to copyright, trade ...
- BC Law Review Symposium, panel 4
- Mammoth opinion in drug false advertising case
- BC Law Review Symposium, panel 3
- Minor Rescuecom question
- BC Law Review Symposium, panel 2
- Reputation and Property Meet the First Amendment
- Removal attempt fails despite CAFA, preemption arg...
-
▼
April
(37)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2039)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
Very well done Rebecca. It was overall a great story and your comments really added depth.
Post a Comment