Because really, what's a blog for?
Gone in 60 Milliseconds: Trademark Law and Cognitive Science, 86 Texas L. Rev. (forthcoming 2007). Email me if you want a copy of the current version.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(380)
-
▼
March
(30)
- What Ifs? Copyright Law I
- What Ifs? Keynote storyteller
- What Ifs? Patents
- What Ifs?
- What Ifs and Other Alternative Intellectual Proper...
- Brief comment on CCBill
- Second Circuit rejects foreign famous marks doctri...
- The messy intersection of copyright, trade secret,...
- Gender & IP, Panel 3
- Gender & IP, Panel 2
- Gender & IP, Panel 1 Q&A
- Gender & IP, Panel 1
- AU’s Washington College of Law, 4th Annual IP/Gend...
- ACLU v. Gonzales
- Self-promotion
- KinderStart v. Google dismissed
- Sweetness and power
- Advertising injury policy coverage for counterclaims?
- Nationwide coupon settlement upheld in cold sore case
- Patry on My Fair Ladies
- Do you care where your basketball came from?
- When Lanham Act violations aren't "advertising inj...
- Another version of My Fair Ladies
- My new article on fair use and feminism
- Salon's sports writer on the NFL's "Big Game" trad...
- TracFone resellers held liable for DMCA violations
- Using photos of competitor's product not unfair co...
- DirecTV's picture quality may beat cable; its lega...
- Best Buy isn't
- Shiffrin tribute: concluding reflections
-
▼
March
(30)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (948)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1657)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3079)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
2 comments:
SSRN link ?
--Ben
I'm actually hoping to make some improvements in editing, so I want to wait on SSRN. I know people take a variety of approaches to SSRN publication, and maybe eventually I'll change my mind.
Post a Comment