John Oliver covers topics relevant to advertising law again
in this
piece on native advertising and the fact that it only works by tricking people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(518)
-
▼
August
(47)
- #1 with a bullet: Nutribullet wins false advertisi...
- What does reputational harm mean? Lessons from App...
- overstating competitor's relationship with FTC tar...
- Presumed irreparable: 3d Circuit applies eBay to a...
- I’ll give you four factors, and the last three don...
- Bring me my (bonded) leather: deceptiveness claims...
- Consumers can't be forced to use nonexistent arbit...
- Reading list: music copyright and similarity judgm...
- Coffee's for classes: 7th Cir. reinstates class ac...
- Lexmark applied to false association claims under ...
- Dastar-ing about architecture: 7th Circuit reverse...
- Today in parody shirts
- When should TM claimants use the Madrid system?
- News for storage jars, Thai military coup edition
- Dastar and karaoke
- Trademark question of the day
- Is porn generic for pornography?
- Gripe sites protected despite use of URL and "Offi...
- Personal liability for corporate scheme appropriat...
- As pure as New York snow: Bette Davis as icon and ...
- Personalized sales pitches as "advertising"
- safe distance rule allows contempt after injunctio...
- Kindle Worlds and fans
- Sneak peek at the new edition of Advertising & Mar...
- Writing on a clean slate: 7th Circuit affirms dism...
- business tort review: Lanham Act doesn't cover all...
- Needs more facts: insufficient allegations of diss...
- FTC can presume consumer reliance in contempt proc...
- Reading list: copyright history
- court borrows limitations period from consumer pro...
- Lexmark's effect on "commercial advertising or pro...
- Dodged a virus and copyright liability: Court rule...
- Product disparagement as trademark dilution?
- IPSC part 10: hodgepodge
- IPSC part 9: copyright plenary session
- IPSC part 8: second plenary: copyright reform/inno...
- IPSC part 7: copyright limitations
- IPSC part 6: copyright/TM enforcement
- IPSC part 5: more copyright
- IPSC part 4: copyright (and a bit on the right of ...
- IPSC part 3: judicial panel
- IPSC part 2: trademark theory
- IPSC part 1
- bait and switch as both false advertising and trad...
- Use of mark on product isn't "ad" for insurance pu...
- John Oliver on native advertising
- Prevailing copyright defendant acts as private AG,...
-
▼
August
(47)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (3)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (284)
- antitrust (50)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (539)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (280)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (276)
- conferences (939)
- consumer protection (1001)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (102)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1680)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (165)
- dastar (198)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (262)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (204)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3200)
- false association (18)
- false designation of origin (8)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (282)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (452)
- ftc (186)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (44)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (75)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (139)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (117)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (230)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (2)
- preemption (275)
- presentations (121)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (148)
- property (18)
- reading list (313)
- remedies (287)
- right of publicity (271)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (360)
- surveys (113)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (117)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2096)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment