Truth in Advertising, Barton Beebe, Mark Lemley, Alexandra Roberts and I just filed a brief arguing that the Supreme Court should clarify the role of intent in Lanham Act cases.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2026
(29)
-
▼
February
(16)
- WIPIP Panel 6: Design and Brand; Protectable Subje...
- WIPIP Panel 5: Trademark Doctrine
- WIPIP Panel 4: Emerging Technologies
- "shipping protection fee" providing no extra prote...
- WIPIP Panel 3: Deepfakes, Celebrities, and Movies
- WIPIP Panel 2: Copyright and Culture
- WIPIP, BU Panel 1: Trademark Theory and Practice
- Deadly automatic litterbox might be falsely advert...
- Amicus in support of cert in Lanham Act intent/dam...
- Does "Dead Weeds in 1 Day" mean the entire weed wi...
- (c) licensor's claims about competitor's allegedly...
- Fairlife brand name plausibly misleading where cow...
- disgorgement can't be a lottery windfall--even whe...
- CFP: emerging First Amendment scholars
- "ambiguity" is taking hold in consumer protection ...
- conducting dueling internet searches converts atty...
-
▼
February
(16)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (3)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (284)
- antitrust (50)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (540)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (55)
- class actions (280)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (277)
- conferences (948)
- consumer protection (1011)
- content moderation (4)
- contracts (102)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1689)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (167)
- dastar (199)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (59)
- dilution (263)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (33)
- dmca (205)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3227)
- false association (20)
- false designation of origin (8)
- false endorsement (14)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (282)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (454)
- ftc (186)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (44)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (75)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (139)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (117)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (234)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (2)
- preemption (275)
- presentations (122)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (148)
- property (18)
- reading list (314)
- remedies (291)
- right of publicity (273)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (361)
- surveys (113)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (118)
- trade secrets (83)
- trademark (2117)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment