Are they really super jeep tours?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2023
(243)
-
▼
July
(18)
- WaPo on gold advertising and right-wing media
- Defendant's belief its ads were effective is evide...
- Former distributor's continuing use of "authorized...
- over aggressive partial dissent, 11th Cir. allows ...
- Covid-19 Act gives government more options in proc...
- "24 Hour" cosmetics could be misleading as to suns...
- False advertising and TM infringement receive very...
- no duty to defend despite allegations of label cop...
- "stacked" car insurance is plausibly deceptive as ...
- Seen in my travels
- Expert witnesses as Lanham Act defendants
- Generic use in the wild
- Ambiguity could be deceptive where "buy 3, get two...
- Oregon SCt rules on "ascertainable loss" in false ...
- no predominance of common issues where many consum...
- odd 2d Circuit case about misleadingness versus co...
- conclusory allegations of confusion don't allege s...
- Inter American Convention allows claims that Lanha...
-
▼
July
(18)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (921)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1637)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (157)
- dastar (191)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3025)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (5)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (270)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (101)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2016)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
When compared to the size of the man, one could argue "yes"
Post a Comment