Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(334)
-
▼
April
(36)
- Internet surveys are admissible (but may raise IRB...
- 4th Cir. affirms dismissal where P didn't allege s...
- My IP collection widens
- Reading list: empirical evidence about FTC's subst...
- TM/(c) questions of the day
- Dastar bars TM claim based on unlicensed copying o...
- "Australian for [American] beer" isn't deceptive, ...
- Ninth Circuit bars consumer claims challenging ass...
- Sixth Circuit has nominative fair use sans la lettre
- 9th Circuit revives class action against allegedly...
- Georgetown Tech Law Review seeks submissions
- Presumptions and evidence of causation both work i...
- Having a product in development isn't enough for L...
- My colleague Laura K. Donohue, now on Twitter
- Grange grudge: court orders disclaimer to resolve ...
- Uber can't get taxi false advertising case dismiss...
- Who registers the watchmen? court needs more info ...
- Lack of damages dooms false marking, advertising c...
- Ordinary false advertising isn't disparagement for...
- Don't try to make a Lanham Act case out of a copyr...
- Flea market case on secondary (and tertiary) liabi...
- Law360 article on my ICE suit by Bill Donahue
- No evidence of harm means no disgorgement in false...
- false advertising dispute based on study in medica...
- lack of substantiation isn't actionable, but claim...
- Reed invalidates highway sign distance and permit ...
- Court finds materiality of color questionable
- Causation failure dooms Lanham Act claim in bioeng...
- LiveJournal's missteps threaten its DMCA protection
- California Supreme Court finds waiver of statutory...
- Lexmark injury requirement no bar to competitor's ...
- Copyright preemption and the right of publicity in...
- interpreting state law narrowly, court denies bad ...
- Incontestability challenge raised too late, court ...
- NY class certified in "flushable" wipes case with ...
- Appraisals are opinions, not facts
-
▼
April
(36)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (538)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (278)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (272)
- conferences (930)
- consumer protection (970)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (101)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1664)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (161)
- dastar (197)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3134)
- false association (13)
- false designation of origin (7)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (275)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (444)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (137)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (226)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (270)
- presentations (119)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (146)
- property (18)
- reading list (311)
- remedies (282)
- right of publicity (267)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (357)
- surveys (109)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2068)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment