Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
March
(73)
- Penn IP symposium: Cindy Cohn of EFF
- Penn Symposium: 3D printing
- Penn symposium: fan fiction
- Penn symposium: gaming
- Starting now: Penn IP symposium
- Recommended reading: Private Copyright Reform
- Talking about the DMCA
- Trade dress protected in combination; not all elem...
- 40-year delay by FDA weighs against primary jurisd...
- Small number of consumer complaints insufficient t...
- Supreme Court takes on consumer protection and pre...
- lost communities
- Ed Felten on the new freedom to tinker
- The Onion does advertising law
- Dot-com disclosures: an update from the FTC and NAD
- The DMCA is worse than you think
- Chinese copy culture
- Kirtsaeng
- Wisconsin court construes consumer protection acts...
- Newsday not liable for stories/complaints about co...
- Lack of substantiation can be false when advertise...
- Bruce Lee right of publicity claims survive summar...
- Materiality still required even if falsity conceded
- Wells Fargo receives an education in abandonment
- JAMA article not commercially disparaging, given s...
- Dawn Donut inapplicable to reverse confusion
- Santa Clara Internet Law WIP part 4
- Santa Clara Internet WIP: speech
- Santa Clara WIP 2: Copyright/IP
- Cyberlaw Works in Progress, Santa Clara
- DMCA conference: 512 operations
- DMCA conference: 512 litigation
- DMCA conference: judicial perspective on 512
- DMCA conference: 512 history
- DMCA conference: rulemaking
- DMCA conference: 1201 and 1202
- DMCA conference: a word from Goodlatte
- DMCA conference: Bruce Lehman: yeah, we did an end...
- infringement by TM licensee doesn't itself make TM...
- Kickstarter and limits on rewards
- Jolls on image-based warnings on cigarette packs
- Guest Post: Ann Lipton on Amgen
- "Brain development" claims get further chance to d...
- First Amendment protects WWE's statements about wr...
- Tisha Turk on multiple viewpoints
- Adventures in mis/rebranding
- Fair use finding leads to fee award in case over 7...
- Are Mobileye and iOnRoad confusingly similar?
- copyright claim presents extraterritoriality, Dast...
- Vintage copyright overclaiming
- On the radio
- New piece: Judges as Bad Reviewers
- The red shoe diaries
- Chris Sprigman on The Eye Alone Is the Judge
- Statements about insurance policies' flexibility n...
- Truth and consequences: "true fit" for apparel ser...
- Dastar knocks out a false advertising by misapprop...
- The sweet taste of defendant success
- Oranges are not the only lawsuit (though this one is)
- When "save--plus 10% at the register" means a pric...
- foreclosure robosigning violated Washington Consum...
- trademark infringement as literal falsity
- Kraft spread: many food claims survive preemption ...
- Quasi-pun avoids genericity, doesn't allow plainti...
- DRM chair
- Another food case gets cut back
- March Copyright Events at GW Law
- standing, nationwide class issues cut down formula...
- Further on that reasonable person
- the reasonable person standard in US and Canada
- Cold comfort: claim against P&G partially revived
- Ponzi scheme leads to securities and consumer prot...
- Must be the shoes: another footwear claim survives
-
▼
March
(73)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
2 comments:
To be fair, companies have been doing that for a while, via planned obsolescence. They're just less obvious about it. - GK
Yeah, but it's not unlawful to fix the breakable parts--a potentially big difference!
Post a Comment