Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(392)
-
▼
November
(45)
- New article: Fighting Freestyle
- Political Real Person Fiction (RPF)
- Slate on achieving substantial similarity without ...
- Crisis pregnancy centers and disclosure
- The other legal side of Leopold & Loeb
- Staying Lanham Act case for NAD not expedient
- Fighting confusion with keywords
- Schering doesn't justify reconsideration in Whirlp...
- NYT trend story on false advertising claims
- Pleading false advertising after Iqbal
- Hope my girlfriend don't mind it
- Project Runway does IP
- Actually, the AP likes fair use after all
- Another reason I'm glad to be a vegetarian
- Non-survey experts in trademark cases
- The history of snake oil
- California law allows UCL claim against insurer
- Presenting in Chicago
- Ignorance of 230 is bliss for lawyer ad regulation
- Damageless music infringement
- Wow.
- Tarnishing Harvard
- Add another to the overreaching trademark annals
- Reverse confusion claim over highly descriptive ma...
- Another drug equivalence claim fails to persuade
- Buffalo Panel #4/Putting Advertising in Context
- Buffalo Panel #3/New Forms of Advertising Regulation
- Buffalo Panel #2/Responding to New Types of Advert...
- Conference on Advertising and the Law, University ...
- Class action inappropriate where regulation is req...
- Software ranking mere opinion, not fact
- 7th Annual IP/Gender: Gender & Invention CFP
- ABA's Private Advertising Committee: program annou...
- Criminal off-label drug promotion
- The Cadillac of metonyms
- Ark. Supreme Court rejects Nexium false advertisin...
- I get knocked down: Women publishing law review notes
- Seventh Circuit rejects Gracen, tries again
- New article by me!
- You blow my mind: Mickey Mouse makeover
- Crimson Tide ebbs: painter free to paint football ...
- There's a lawsuit for that
- Volunteer opportunity
- "Boston Strangler" redux
- Dastar doesn't bar TM claim coupled with copyright...
-
▼
November
(45)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment