Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(392)
-
▼
December
(25)
- This is why I'm pop
- Formulaic: store brand mostly wins a round in form...
- Interest-free credit card offer triggers finance c...
- Organic v. USDA organic
- No speedy resolution for Mach 1 claims by Yeager
- From the archives
- Can word marks be functional?
- License to infringe?
- Say it ain't so, Clark!
- Comment on Trademark Law's Theory of Harm
- Cancer testimonials
- How (some) copyright owners think
- A different take on the attention economy
- Consumer protection hypo of the day
- CFP: Law & Humanities Junior Scholars
- Nominative use of Hogwarts?
- Product displacement
- If you build it, they will gripe
- State claims not preempted but Lanham Act claims p...
- Charbucks case bounced back for third round
- In which I grouse about copyright preemption
- More on my William & Mary piece, Economies of Desire
- Formula for false advertising
- The rare explicitly false statement of sponsorship
- Panel on the FTC's New Endorsement and Testimonial...
-
▼
December
(25)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
Use in commerce? Yes (unless you mean "trademark use" in commerce, in which case I say no, but only because I don't think people will regard this use as designating the source of the colleges' services). Fair use? I guess maybe nominative fair use. But if there's any de minimus confusion, it's irrelevant confusion. (Insert citation here) :)
Post a Comment