Zimmerman v. L’Oreal USA, Inc., 2023 WL 8587620, No. 22-cv-07609-HSG (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2023)
This putative class action bringing the usual
California statutory claims alleges that L’Oréal misleadingly advertises
the sunscreen benefits of some of its cosmetic products, such as L’Oréal
Infallible Fresh Wear 24HR Foundation. The front label statements claiming it
provides “Up to 24HR Breathable Texture,” “Up to 24H Fresh Wear,” and
“Sunscreen Broad Spectrum SPF 25” allegedly led Zimmerman to believe that the
foundation provided 24 hours of sunscreen protection. But this protection lasts
only two hours. The drug facts panel, located underneath a peel-back sticker on
the back label, directs users to “reapply at least every 2 hours” for sunscreen
use.
Similarly, plaintiff Heuchan alleged that she purchased
L’Oréal Infallible Pro-Glow Foundation, whose front label claims that it
provides “Up to 24HR Foundation,” “OCTINOXATE Sunscreen,” and “Broad Spectrum
SPF 15.” It also has a drug facts panel located underneath a peel-back sticker
on the back label, directing users to “reapply at least every 2 hours” for
sunscreen use. Plaintiff Giordano made similar allegations about “Lancome Teint
Idole Ultra 24H Long Wear Matte Foundation,” with a front label claiming
“Octinoxate Sunscreen” “Broad Spectrum SPF 15,” and “Up To 24H Color Wear &
Comfort.” However, the complaint didn’t allege that the Teint foundation’s drug
panel facts are located underneath a peel-back sticker on the back.
L’Oréal argued that it wasn’t plausible that a reasonable
consumer would be deceived because the 24-hour statements clearly referred only
to cosmetic benefits, and that a reasonable consumer would refer to the back
panel. The court agreed with L’Oréal as to Giordano only.
The “Up to 24H Foundation” statement was ambiguous, but it
was not clear that this ambiguity “can be resolved by reference to the back
label.” “The Court cannot conclude as a matter of law that a reasonable
consumer would peel back the label in the store, before purchasing the product,
to find and read these instructions.” So too with the Teint foundation, but the
back label resolved any ambiguity. (As a consumer, I'd worry about being forced to buy anything I'd done that to!)
No comments:
Post a Comment