Filed today: Mark McKenna, Chris Sprigman, Mark Lemley, Tyler Ochoa, Betsy Rosenblatt, Pam Samuelson, Kathy Strandburg, and I submitted
a brief in this copyright separability case, arguing that conceptual separability is simply a coda to physical separability, dealing with situations in which physical separation couldn't be accomplished without destroying the useful article--regardless, there must be
something other than the design of the article itself that can be identified as a protectable work. The existence of design patent also sheds important light on the limited role Congress intended copyright to play for useful articles.
No comments:
Post a Comment