Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log

False advertising and more

Saturday, December 05, 2009

In which I grouse about copyright preemption

›
People v. Williams (Ill. S. Ct. 2009) Since I just taught this topic, I figured a new decision in the area was worth blogging about. ...
Thursday, December 03, 2009

More on my William & Mary piece, Economies of Desire

›
The piece, on creative motivations and their overlap or lack thereof with copyright's incentive theory, is available here , and William ...
Wednesday, December 02, 2009

Formula for false advertising

›
PBM Products, LLC v. Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 2009) According to PBM Products, the maker of store-brand infant form...

The rare explicitly false statement of sponsorship

›
Most times, trademark owners' allegations that consumers will be confused about sponsorship or affiliation are just ways to expand the s...
Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Panel on the FTC's New Endorsement and Testimonial Guides

›
Sponsored by the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Committees on Private Advertising Litigation , Consumer Protection, Feder...
2 comments:
Monday, November 30, 2009

New article: Fighting Freestyle

›
Rebecca Tushnet, Fighting Freestyle: The First Amendment, Fairness, and Corporate Reputation , 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1457 (2009) Abstract: There a...
Saturday, November 28, 2009

Political Real Person Fiction (RPF)

›
RPF doesn't pose the same legal challenges as fan fiction (one reading: the commercial sanctity of texts is more important to the people...
Friday, November 27, 2009

Slate on achieving substantial similarity without copying

›
This is a really interesting story about how two crossword puzzles could end up looking extremely similar without copying, through the inte...
Thursday, November 26, 2009

Crisis pregnancy centers and disclosure

›
Baltimore just passed a measure requiring crisis pregnancy centers to disclose that they do not “provide or make referral for abortion or b...

The other legal side of Leopold & Loeb

›
Edward J. Larson, Murder Will Out: Rethinking the Right of Publicity through One Classic Case A really interesting story about the rig...
Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Staying Lanham Act case for NAD not expedient

›
Expedia, Inc. v. Priceline.com Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00712-RSL (W.D. Wash. Nov. 23, 2009) Expedia sued Priceline over allegedly misleading ...

Fighting confusion with keywords

›
Going Rouge, the unflattering version of the Sarah Palin story, is apparently causing enough confusion with Palin's Going Rogue that the...
2 comments:
Monday, November 23, 2009

Schering doesn't justify reconsideration in Whirlpool steam case

›
LG Electronics vs. Whirlpool Corp. (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2009) Earlier discussion here . Thanks to Ron Rothstein of Winston & Straw...
Sunday, November 22, 2009

NYT trend story on false advertising claims

›
" Companies that were once content to fight in grocery-store aisles and on television commercials are now choosing a different route —...

Pleading false advertising after Iqbal

›
Tseng v. Marukai Corp. U.S.A., 2009 WL 3841933 (C.D. Cal.) Tseng alleged patent infringement and false advertising, but didn’t include ...
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.