tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post8956573557209448243..comments2024-03-22T08:01:16.236-04:00Comments on Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: Reversing meaning is transformative in use of composition, court rulesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-90675610101804924572017-06-01T22:28:57.080-04:002017-06-01T22:28:57.080-04:00In theory that 6th Circuit was always limited by f...In theory that 6th Circuit was always limited by fair use; also, since this case concerned the composition, not the sound recording, it never fell within the 6th Circuit's mistaken rule that any copying of the sound recording, however de minimis, constitutes infringement.Rebecca Tushnethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17344226000864611148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-66600755191538934622017-06-01T14:57:31.967-04:002017-06-01T14:57:31.967-04:00Do you think this case has a chance of reversing t...Do you think this case has a chance of reversing the nearly "strict liability" rule that exists on music sampling where any use of a previous recording is considered infringement?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-34761882782668811772017-06-01T13:30:01.496-04:002017-06-01T13:30:01.496-04:00I think it has a good chance--it's not as much...I think it has a good chance--it's not as much like the "Who's on First" case in the sense that there's an explicit message that is reversed in the challenged use, rather than a use "to be funny," which the court of appeals said was the same for both uses in Who's on First. Somewhat similar to the older case about quotes from a pro-choice book used in an anti-abortion book, I think.Rebecca Tushnethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17344226000864611148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-4310212308420735802017-06-01T11:36:44.300-04:002017-06-01T11:36:44.300-04:00I love the decision, but do you think it will stan...I love the decision, but do you think it will stand?Lisa Macklemhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11520991485947597912noreply@blogger.com