tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post5449647495353294165..comments2024-03-22T08:01:16.236-04:00Comments on Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: small note on Brownmark Films v. Comedy PartnersUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-41484217383427449052011-07-15T23:46:00.549-04:002011-07-15T23:46:00.549-04:00Quite possibly not, Bruce--but then judicial humor...Quite possibly not, Bruce--but then judicial humor is a risky business at best. Perhaps it would have been better to skip the adjective.RThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00850241338827117087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-49966869913163934452011-07-15T23:16:21.237-04:002011-07-15T23:16:21.237-04:00I could be wrong, but I don't think Judge Stad...I could be wrong, but I don't think Judge Stadtmueller really found them cryptic.Bruce Boydenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02247768315353108904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-33048354403534647432011-07-15T20:12:59.043-04:002011-07-15T20:12:59.043-04:00I wonder how much Eddie Murphy influenced this dis...I wonder how much Eddie Murphy influenced this dispute . . .<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oxh4YvV2MCMDnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-511594901428008142011-07-13T09:58:56.434-04:002011-07-13T09:58:56.434-04:00Pardon the pun, but LMAO!Pardon the pun, but LMAO!Michael La Portehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16907905315958867672noreply@blogger.com