tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post4972992635429750520..comments2024-03-22T08:01:16.236-04:00Comments on Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: Dastar-barred claim survives both as false advertising and false designationUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-79472759197298821252015-04-17T18:09:11.503-04:002015-04-17T18:09:11.503-04:00If you actually went to INSYSMA's website, the...If you actually went to INSYSMA's website, they used a stock photo from NASA's and Orbital Sciences website They also credited the photographer. It also states that they had ongoing subcontracts with Orbital Sciences and never said anything about installing the TELHS. There were no standalone pics of the TELHS nor were there discernible depictions of the TELHS. Nothing that would seem to fool a technical observer. Just a rocket plume and a rocket. Upon discovery, AFS' claim will fail. And it won't even be close.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com