tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post653064735574154066..comments2024-03-22T08:01:16.236-04:00Comments on Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: Release trumps right of publicity claim even when endorsement was alteredUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-23847526633788880502012-01-06T03:38:41.932-05:002012-01-06T03:38:41.932-05:00The saddest thing about this is the history:
* In...The saddest thing about this is the history:<br /><br />* In 1995 they say they got an endorsement from her for a shark cartilage treatment for cancer.<br /><br />* In 1995 they announced that they knew that shark cartilage is ineffective against cancer. Ref: http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag99/mar99-awsi.html<br /><br />* In 2005 they took her endorsement for a product that they admit they knew was worthless and changed it to another unrelated product.<br /><br />What laws should be used to stop these kinds of actions?Mac Harwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12130057839014374504noreply@blogger.com