tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post5634051818714041289..comments2024-03-22T08:01:16.236-04:00Comments on Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: No standing for consumer not exposed to misrepresentationsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-61931547699615598522012-06-18T12:07:34.750-04:002012-06-18T12:07:34.750-04:00Paul, as I understand it, DC courts are also gover...Paul, as I understand it, DC courts are also governed by Article III, since it's a federal district. I don't know whether the courts have determined that's constitutionally required or not.Rebecca Tushnethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17344226000864611148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-73709729603640124162012-06-18T11:37:30.492-04:002012-06-18T11:37:30.492-04:00This is very odd. If the district court lacked Ar...This is very odd. If the district court lacked Article III standing, then wasn't the removal improvident? Isn't the proper judgment one of remand to DC Superior Court, not dismissal?Paul Alan Levyhttp://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=396noreply@blogger.com