tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post1346257806193084519..comments2024-03-22T08:01:16.236-04:00Comments on Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: From the archivesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-85208431157824590952021-12-12T13:58:53.652-05:002021-12-12T13:58:53.652-05:00This is about as good as it gets, I assume because...This is about as good as it gets, I assume because the scan is from microfilm. I can edit in a .png which might be a little better but you may not be able to tell any difference.Rebecca Tushnethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17344226000864611148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-53196422288711871072021-12-12T13:06:10.934-05:002021-12-12T13:06:10.934-05:00Thanks so much! Would you happen to have a higher ...Thanks so much! Would you happen to have a higher resolution of this image? I just can't seem to find it in any online archive anywhere.Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06460509420580257636noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-78604100617290691492021-11-25T22:56:26.695-05:002021-11-25T22:56:26.695-05:00Erie Times, July 23, 1981
Erie Times, July 23, 1981<br />RThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00850241338827117087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-1783782319441230202021-11-25T19:43:36.848-05:002021-11-25T19:43:36.848-05:00What is the origin of the advertisement?What is the origin of the advertisement?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5764290.post-91068779059306736382009-12-30T17:23:53.835-05:002009-12-30T17:23:53.835-05:00Fantastic find. By coincidence, I've just been...Fantastic find. By coincidence, I've just been mulling over this issue, and came across Nimmer's discussion of this. Nimmer thinks that the logical extension of this argument is that rentals are suspect:<br /><br /><i>In the abstract, it may be argued that the practice of renting a given videocassette of a motion picture to various members of the public gives rise to "public" performances of the work, although each such performance of the work on a home television set is received only by an individual or family group. Nevertheless, the same copy gives rise to numerous performances, which are received by the public "at different times." Therefore, under the wording of the Act, and by reason of the underlying rationale of what constitutes a "public" performance, it may follow that each individual rental performance is a "public" performance.</i><br /><br />I think this has to be wrong; I think multiple private performances is getting confused here with seriatim public performances to small groups. If the viewings in the home are not public performances, then stacking them up doesn't make them a public performance.Bruce Boydenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02247768315353108904noreply@blogger.com