skip to main | skip to sidebar

Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log

False advertising and more

Monday, September 10, 2012

New review up

I have a review of Peter Decherney’s Hollywood’s Copyright Wars: From Edison to the Internet in Jotwell.
Posted by Rebecca Tushnet at 9:26 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: copyright, reading list

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Subscribe

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Follow by Email

Rebecca Tushnet

  • RSS feed
  • Twitter (repost of blog)
  • My website
  • Email me
  • Georgetown Law

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (260)
    • ►  May (37)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (73)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (50)
  • ▼  2012 (598)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ▼  September (56)
      • Not sure I would have done this in a moral rights ...
      • No contract?
      • Imagine if the Constitution were the story of a sm...
      • Explicitly false, but not misleading
      • Transformative artist of the day
      • Advertising and copyright stories in Slate
      • Collaborative problem solving becomes non-collabor...
      • How do you plead "commercial advertising or promot...
      • When does "Zero trans fat" mean "just a little tra...
      • Disparaging reference can't infringe as a matter o...
      • "Sporty Car at a Great Value Price" may imply driv...
      • The market for lemons/law schools
      • Trouble brewing in coffee TM/advertising case
      • Welcome to Scotland! (or somewhere else)
      • Adobe crumbles: litigation mistakes allow reseller...
      • Copyright hypo of the day
      • Being an expert witness as commercial speech under...
      • Filtered honey is honey despite Cal. law to the co...
      • 6th Circuit finds "5 Hour Energy" suggestive for e...
      • Some statements in press release aren't commercial...
      • Falsity, historical fact, and who's qualified to f...
      • That's where the light is
      • Just who's being paternalist?
      • What does "healthier" mean to consumers?
      • Mathematically impossible claims aren't literally ...
      • AU TM roundtable, part two
      • AU TM roundtable, part one
      • Allegedly copied infomercial can't support misappr...
      • Cracked iPhone doesn't support consumer claims
      • StubHub's guarantee doesn't guarantee tickets will...
      • New review up
      • What we see and what we don't
      • Sharp dealers can deploy arbitration clauses too
      • PLI briefing on Louboutin
      • Can fandom change society?
      • Unofficial Illiniwek shirts
      • Today's Google doodle
      • Standing in securities
      • Ripped from the headlines
      • Rewards card didn't need to disclose annual fee in...
      • Buyer-approved substitution doesn't violate Lanham...
      • Rounding up mobile minutes is mostly not actionabl...
      • Ben & Jerry's sues Ben & Cherry's porn producer
      • 9th Circuit vacates opinion condemning class actio...
      • Second Circuit tries again on "use as a mark"
      • Louboutin v. YSL released
      • Adaptation
      • Failure to disclose non-US origin not false despit...
      • Plaintiff's longrunning uniqueness claims establis...
      • my latest acquisition
      • Browsewrap fails to bind customer to individual ar...
      • Consumers can't sue for unfair practices in legal,...
      • Initial interest confusion claim over keyword ads ...
      • Lexmark v. Static Control: the false advertising y...
      • House brands, a continuing series
      • The NYT on unreliable reviews
    • ►  August (53)
    • ►  July (62)
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (45)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (430)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (40)
    • ►  October (39)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (40)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2010 (312)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (35)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2009 (392)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (45)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2008 (359)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2007 (380)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (38)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2006 (336)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (45)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2005 (50)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2004 (14)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2003 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)

Labels

  • 230 (40)
  • acpa (7)
  • advertising (154)
  • antitrust (1)
  • art law (24)
  • attribution (25)
  • blogging (17)
  • california (270)
  • cfaa (3)
  • cfps (11)
  • class actions (175)
  • cmi (1)
  • comics (30)
  • commercial speech (90)
  • conferences (490)
  • consumer protection (272)
  • contracts (32)
  • copying (156)
  • copyright (853)
  • creative commons (12)
  • cultural property (8)
  • cybersquatting (1)
  • damages (67)
  • dastar (82)
  • defamation (100)
  • derivative works (2)
  • design patent (1)
  • dilution (156)
  • disparagement (6)
  • dmca (103)
  • drm (38)
  • false advertising (1226)
  • fan (1)
  • fan fiction (56)
  • fanworks (125)
  • fda (136)
  • fees (3)
  • first amendment (176)
  • ftc (109)
  • geographic indications (27)
  • google (64)
  • insurance (44)
  • interviews (5)
  • jurisdiction (2)
  • libraries (17)
  • misappropriation (9)
  • moral rights (11)
  • music (82)
  • my writings (48)
  • net neutrality (5)
  • parody (17)
  • patent (59)
  • patents (124)
  • peer production (27)
  • preemption (124)
  • presentations (66)
  • privacy (64)
  • procedure (98)
  • property (8)
  • reading list (174)
  • remedies (40)
  • right of publicity (118)
  • secondary liability (74)
  • securities (4)
  • standing (164)
  • surveys (16)
  • teaching (19)
  • tortious interference (37)
  • trade secrets (31)
  • trademark (901)
  • traditional knowledge (5)
  • unconscionability (3)
  • unfairness (25)

Things I've read

Ad Links

  • FTC Business Center Blog
  • ABA's Private Advertising Litigation Committee
  • All About Ad Law (Venable)
  • Consumer Advertising Law Blog (Arnold & Porter)
  • Consumer Law & Policy Blog (Public Citizen)
  • E-Commerce & Tech Law Blog
  • The Commercial Closet
  • The Language of Advertising

Copyright Links

  • Books Online: No US Access
  • Columbia Law Library Music Plagiarism Archive
  • Copyright Litigation Blog
  • Copyright Termination Calculator
  • Current Copyright Legal Literature
  • Fairly Used: Stanford Fair Use Project
  • Illegal Art exhibit
  • Jessica Litman's Copyright Links
  • Keep Your Copyrights (Columbia U.)
  • Larry Lessig on Free Culture
  • Madisonian.net
  • Owners, Borrowers and Thieves
  • Political Remix Video
  • Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)
  • Respect Copyrights (movie industry site)
  • The HP Lovecraft Library
  • Useful Arts.us

Trademark Links

  • Beauty Marks (Jessica Stone Levy)
  • Counterfeit Chic
  • Current Trademark Legal Literature
  • ICANN: Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
  • Jessica Litman's Trademark Links
  • Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
  • Pattishall IP blog
  • Search UDRP Decisions
  • Seattle Trademark Lawyer
  • Technology & Marketing Law Blog
  • The Trademark Blog
  • The TTABlog
  • UDRPLaw Net

Other Links

  • xkcd
  • (Anti)Trust Me
  • Balkinization
  • CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) Law Blog
  • Confessions of an Aca/Fan: Henry Jenkins
  • Ephemeral Traces: Kristina Busse's blog
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • HearUsNow.org
  • History of Animation in Court
  • Jotwell: Journal of Things We Like Lots
  • Michigan Telecom & Tech Law Review blog
  • Online Fandom
  • Post or Perish (Online media legal issues)
  • PropertyProf Blog
  • Rocket Docket (EDVa IP Litigation)
  • The Gray Blog (parallel imports)
  • Wassom.com: law and social media
 

Creative Commons

Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.