skip to main | skip to sidebar

Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log

False advertising and more

Monday, July 23, 2012

Watch me talk about fan fiction

I did an interview about fan fiction on Reason.tv.
Posted by Rebecca Tushnet at 8:26 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Labels: copyright, fan fiction

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Subscribe

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Follow by Email

Rebecca Tushnet

  • RSS feed
  • Twitter (repost of blog)
  • My website
  • Email me
  • Georgetown Law

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (252)
    • ►  May (29)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (73)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (50)
  • ▼  2012 (598)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (56)
    • ►  August (53)
    • ▼  July (62)
      • Attempt to stop reality show with TM/publicity cla...
      • Review essay: The Knockoff Economy/There's No Free...
      • Does a purchaser of one flavor of ice cream have s...
      • Feature that doesn't work well can still be functi...
      • Law school fraud cases will go to discovery
      • Adding "the" and "company" makes generic term prot...
      • Abortion law or First Amendment law?
      • Slate on false claims by dietary supplements
      • What does it take to plead copyright infringement?...
      • When marketing partnerships go wrong
      • Is the US First Amendment a model for other countr...
      • Advertising on Craigslist for a rubber stamp attor...
      • Heads I win, tails you lose
      • Causation/reliance interplay dooms condo false adv...
      • Weakness in evidence didn't make Nestle's "clinica...
      • Caveat student: lawsuit against Cooley law school ...
      • Watch me talk about fan fiction
      • The right hand doesn't know the left hand has DRM
      • How to lie with statistics: Netflix percentages no...
      • Alleging false marking with particularity: difficu...
      • Authentic fakes
      • Gripe site makes confusion unlikely, says court on...
      • Reading list: copyright and ratings
      • Copyright and disproportionate effects on images
      • Tasting the trademark, very rich guys edition
      • Best title of the year so far
      • So how did all those FDA surveillance documents ge...
      • 9th Circuit rejects settlement for wrong cy pres b...
      • some of it's made up, and some of it can't be quan...
      • Goldman & Tushnet on Advertising and Marketing Law...
      • how standing cuts down class actions
      • Apparently false demonstration still not literally...
      • Priorities
      • Can your personal photo be reused for a political ...
      • Fair dealing as fair use?
      • Plaintiff allegedly shut out of market lacks stand...
      • So, does Iraq have the right of publicity?
      • I got 99 problems but copyright ain't one?
      • Sci-fi children's books
      • Punny business names
      • Morality, business models, and music
      • Drug composition claims and expiration dates not l...
      • Slowness in Skype, http, etc. not enough to allege...
      • alleged violation of FDA regs on "healthy" allows ...
      • Patent noninfringement claims lead to falsity find...
      • Dastar doesn't bar claim that supplier switch conf...
      • Claim that 5-hour Energy misleads about source of ...
      • Taking credit for firm founders' prior work create...
      • Using content to sell technology
      • Great site, offensively dumb terms of use
      • Recent reading: copyright and uncertainty
      • Something I wondered about SocialCam before I bloc...
      • Quickly confessed error saves defendants from disg...
      • More effort required to plead around first sale th...
      • iPad customers' claims over termination of unlimit...
      • Drug studies as drug marketing
      • Claims of inflated hospital rates not actionable w...
      • Smartphone battery drain and disclosure of locatio...
      • Contradictory "amount owed" mortgage letters justi...
      • Fourth Circuit affirms invalidation of pregnancy c...
      • The Ninth Circuit shrugs; nonconsumer confusion ca...
      • Reprinting news article about competitor is commer...
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (45)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (430)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (40)
    • ►  October (39)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (40)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2010 (312)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (35)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2009 (392)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (45)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2008 (359)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2007 (380)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (38)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2006 (336)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (45)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2005 (50)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2004 (14)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2003 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)

Labels

  • 230 (40)
  • acpa (7)
  • advertising (154)
  • antitrust (1)
  • art law (24)
  • attribution (25)
  • blogging (17)
  • california (265)
  • cfaa (3)
  • cfps (11)
  • class actions (173)
  • cmi (1)
  • comics (30)
  • commercial speech (90)
  • conferences (490)
  • consumer protection (267)
  • contracts (32)
  • copying (156)
  • copyright (853)
  • creative commons (12)
  • cultural property (8)
  • cybersquatting (1)
  • damages (66)
  • dastar (81)
  • defamation (99)
  • derivative works (2)
  • design patent (1)
  • dilution (156)
  • disparagement (5)
  • dmca (103)
  • drm (38)
  • false advertising (1219)
  • fan (1)
  • fan fiction (56)
  • fanworks (125)
  • fda (134)
  • fees (3)
  • first amendment (175)
  • ftc (109)
  • geographic indications (27)
  • google (64)
  • insurance (43)
  • interviews (5)
  • jurisdiction (2)
  • libraries (17)
  • misappropriation (9)
  • moral rights (11)
  • music (82)
  • my writings (48)
  • net neutrality (5)
  • parody (17)
  • patent (59)
  • patents (124)
  • peer production (27)
  • preemption (123)
  • presentations (66)
  • privacy (64)
  • procedure (98)
  • property (8)
  • reading list (174)
  • remedies (40)
  • right of publicity (118)
  • secondary liability (74)
  • securities (4)
  • standing (163)
  • surveys (16)
  • teaching (19)
  • tortious interference (36)
  • trade secrets (31)
  • trademark (899)
  • traditional knowledge (5)
  • unconscionability (3)
  • unfairness (25)

Things I've read

Ad Links

  • FTC Business Center Blog
  • ABA's Private Advertising Litigation Committee
  • All About Ad Law (Venable)
  • Consumer Advertising Law Blog (Arnold & Porter)
  • Consumer Law & Policy Blog (Public Citizen)
  • E-Commerce & Tech Law Blog
  • The Commercial Closet
  • The Language of Advertising

Copyright Links

  • Books Online: No US Access
  • Columbia Law Library Music Plagiarism Archive
  • Copyright Litigation Blog
  • Copyright Termination Calculator
  • Current Copyright Legal Literature
  • Fairly Used: Stanford Fair Use Project
  • Illegal Art exhibit
  • Jessica Litman's Copyright Links
  • Keep Your Copyrights (Columbia U.)
  • Larry Lessig on Free Culture
  • Madisonian.net
  • Owners, Borrowers and Thieves
  • Political Remix Video
  • Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)
  • Respect Copyrights (movie industry site)
  • The HP Lovecraft Library
  • Useful Arts.us

Trademark Links

  • Beauty Marks (Jessica Stone Levy)
  • Counterfeit Chic
  • Current Trademark Legal Literature
  • ICANN: Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
  • Jessica Litman's Trademark Links
  • Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
  • Pattishall IP blog
  • Search UDRP Decisions
  • Seattle Trademark Lawyer
  • Technology & Marketing Law Blog
  • The Trademark Blog
  • The TTABlog
  • UDRPLaw Net

Other Links

  • xkcd
  • (Anti)Trust Me
  • Balkinization
  • CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) Law Blog
  • Confessions of an Aca/Fan: Henry Jenkins
  • Ephemeral Traces: Kristina Busse's blog
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • HearUsNow.org
  • History of Animation in Court
  • Jotwell: Journal of Things We Like Lots
  • Michigan Telecom & Tech Law Review blog
  • Online Fandom
  • Post or Perish (Online media legal issues)
  • PropertyProf Blog
  • Rocket Docket (EDVa IP Litigation)
  • The Gray Blog (parallel imports)
  • Wassom.com: law and social media
 

Creative Commons

Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.