Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(380)
-
▼
June
(29)
- Half-naked licensing
- McDonald's still lovin' it
- NYT reviews Andrew Keen on the Cult of the Amateur
- ABA Journal on consumer class actions
- Another false patent marking as false advertising ...
- Lipitor class action proceeds, in part
- Pirate hard?
- This blog has not yet been rated
- Taking a name in vain
- Product placement and "product placement"
- A corny argument
- Ghost in the machine: "fraud on a computer" claim ...
- Good Documentary, Bad Documentary
- Recent press: roleplaying games
- Blue-sky law: court rejects false advertising claim
- How Harry Potter really ends
- Hatred as a motive for copying
- Is reposting candid photos of women fair use?
- PR savvy from worm poop
- False inventorship claim isn't false advertising
- More on market circularity
- Rules of Engagement revisited
- Like a free ride when you've already paid?
- Recent reading on the FTC
- Now taste the lawsuit
- Announcement: an archive of our own
- Amateurs and prose
- A ghoulish false advertising ruling
- User-generated content and privately owned public ...
-
▼
June
(29)
Labels
- 1201 (18)
- 1202 (1)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (920)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1635)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (156)
- dastar (189)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3023)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (4)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (269)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (100)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (80)
- trademark (2015)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
FYI - Its a parody of the last scene of the Sopranos TV series. So it is really a double parody use (character names and objects from Harry Potter and plot and scenes a faire from Sopranos including the non-scene a faire abrupt (go to black) ending).
Post a Comment